没时间, 大约的看了下, 看起来还可信... 于是翻到最后,看了看conclusion. 随便翻了翻...看来是谣传哪...虽然一个资料并不能完全下结论...
Our research has shown that Shanghai's sceptical historians have largely decided that the story of the sign is misleading, and misrepresen- tative of the real nature of Shanghai society (and Shanghai's societies) in the century before 1949.
我们的研究表明, 上海的历史专家很大程度认为这个故事(华人与狗)是有误导性的,并且错误的展现了1949年以前真实的上海社会.
However, we believe that although a close reading of the historical record shows that an officially-sanctioned sign explicitly linlung "dogs and Chinese" never existed, and if it did exist elsewhere was definitely not a prominent and enduring part of the physical landscape of old Shanghai, the evidence relating to park rules does make clear that the kinds of biases this icon has been used to symbolize were indeed a prominent and enduring part of the social and cultural landscape of that city.
尽管,我们相信仔细解读历史记录官方地展示了一个“华人与狗”的故事从不存在, 如果它曾经其他地方(非公园)存在,那么一定不那么明显或者长期在老上海存在. 证据是公园条例这种图标必须是标志化的,并且位于一个明显的地点,它还是一个城市文化和社会的长久部分.
Bickers, Robert A., and Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom. "Shanghai's "Dogs and Chinese Not Admitted" Sign: Legend, History and Contemporary Symbol*." The China Quarterly, 1995. Web. 18 Dec. 2013.<http://www.polonews.info/documenti_originali/Repubblica%20(1912%20-%201949)/Dog_shanghai.pdf> |
发表于 2013-12-18 14:50:29
